Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Right of the accused for cross-examination of parties, whose statement has been relied upon - In the writ appeal, while acknowledging that cross-examination is a part of natural justice, the High Court noted that there is no absolute right to cross-examination, and it depends on each case's facts - Supreme Court refused to interfere into the matter.
Right of the accused for cross-examination of parties, whose statement has been relied upon - In the writ appeal, while acknowledging that cross-examination is a part of natural justice, the High Court noted that there is no absolute right to cross-examination, and it depends on each case's facts - Supreme Court refused to interfere into the matter.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.