<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Cross-Examination Not an Absolute Right; Depends on Case Facts, Says High Court; Supreme Court Declines to Intervene.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74522</link>
    <description>Right of the accused for cross-examination of parties, whose statement has been relied upon - In the writ appeal, while acknowledging that cross-examination is a part of natural justice, the High Court noted that there is no absolute right to cross-examination, and it depends on each case&#039;s facts - Supreme Court refused to interfere into the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2024 08:26:10 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2024 08:26:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=741840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Cross-Examination Not an Absolute Right; Depends on Case Facts, Says High Court; Supreme Court Declines to Intervene.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74522</link>
      <description>Right of the accused for cross-examination of parties, whose statement has been relied upon - In the writ appeal, while acknowledging that cross-examination is a part of natural justice, the High Court noted that there is no absolute right to cross-examination, and it depends on each case&#039;s facts - Supreme Court refused to interfere into the matter.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2024 08:26:10 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74522</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>