Mandatory textile export qualifiers distinguish flame-retardant fabrics from other listed fabrics for automated identification under the textiles ince...
Personal liberty safeguards restrict arrest after court-directed GST appearance, requiring interim release where authorities overreach pending proceed...
Alternative statutory remedy and delay bar GST writ challenges despite pending rectification, while distinct subject matter permits parallel proceedin...
Refund of Customs duty - unjust enrichment - Chennai Port Trust (the buyer) had indeed borne the duty burden, as evidenced by financial records and a letter from the Chief Engineer of Chennai Port Trust. Since the appellant could not prove that the incidence of duty had not been passed on to the buyer, the refund claim was not admissible under the principles of unjust enrichment, as per Section 27 of the Customs Act, 1962. - AT
Refund of Customs duty - unjust enrichment - Chennai Port Trust (the buyer) had indeed borne the duty burden, as evidenced by financial records and a letter from the Chief Engineer of Chennai Port Trust. Since the appellant could not prove that the incidence of duty had not been passed on to the buyer, the refund claim was not admissible under the principles of unjust enrichment, as per Section 27 of the Customs Act, 1962. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
