Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Levy of penalty on appellant u/s 114 (i) and 114 AA of the Customs Act, 1962 - assisting / abetment of export of Muriate of Potash - illicit export of goods - Based on the fact that the Appellant had prepared the documents without the signature of the exporter, no conclusion can be drawn that Appellant was aware about the presence of prohibited goods. No penalty - AT
Levy of penalty on appellant u/s 114 (i) and 114 AA of the Customs Act, 1962 - assisting / abetment of export of Muriate of Potash - illicit export of goods - Based on the fact that the Appellant had prepared the documents without the signature of the exporter, no conclusion can be drawn that Appellant was aware about the presence of prohibited goods. No penalty - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.