Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Penalty u/r 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - appellant was Director during relevant period - Since the demand of the duty has already been settled under SVLDRS Scheme and there is no cause for imposition of penalty under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 on the director of the company who has been a paid employee - AT
Penalty u/r 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - appellant was Director during relevant period - Since the demand of the duty has already been settled under SVLDRS Scheme and there is no cause for imposition of penalty under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 on the director of the company who has been a paid employee - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
