Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Assessment u/s 144C(13) in pursuant to the directions of DRP - In the case in hand, the direction for verification as issued were colourable and the Latin maxim “Quando aliquid prohibetur ex directo, prohibetur et per obliquum”, which means “you cannot do indirectly what you cannot do directly” when applied to aforesaid provisions applicable to DRP prohibits such directions of verification of the whole of the case of an assessee without any element of guidance for the Ld. AO. - AT
Assessment u/s 144C(13) in pursuant to the directions of DRP - In the case in hand, the direction for verification as issued were colourable and the Latin maxim “Quando aliquid prohibetur ex directo, prohibetur et per obliquum”, which means “you cannot do indirectly what you cannot do directly” when applied to aforesaid provisions applicable to DRP prohibits such directions of verification of the whole of the case of an assessee without any element of guidance for the Ld. AO. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.