Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Extended period of limitation - The very fact that the appellant is contesting the issue of invoking larger period of limitation, that the rendering of service under the ‘supply of tangible goods’ is accepted; but for survey, persuasion, etc., by the officials, the tax would have remained unpaid amounting to evasion of duty. The other fact that the rendering of service and the receipt is not shown in the ST-3 return thus clearly amounts to suppression of facts; and hence, it is a clear case of suppression of facts with intent to evade tax payment. - Demand confirmed - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.