Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Insolvency and BankruptcySeptember 30, 2023Case LawsAT
Approval of Resolution Plan - Non Consideration of GST liability as First Charge - the ‘demand’ was not ‘ascertained’ and not crystalised and placed before the 1st Respondent / Resolution Professional for consideration of the ‘Committee of Creditors’. Suffice it, for this ‘Tribunal’, to pertinently point out that the Appellant / Petitioner, is prohibited, based on the ‘Principle of Res judicata’, and ‘by its conduct, is estopped’ from agitating the likewise, grounds for determination before the ‘Adjudicating Authority’ / ‘Tribunal’. - AT
Approval of Resolution Plan - Non Consideration of GST liability as First Charge - the ‘demand’ was not ‘ascertained’ and not crystalised and placed before the 1st Respondent / Resolution Professional for consideration of the ‘Committee of Creditors’. Suffice it, for this ‘Tribunal’, to pertinently point out that the Appellant / Petitioner, is prohibited, based on the ‘Principle of Res judicata’, and ‘by its conduct, is estopped’ from agitating the likewise, grounds for determination before the ‘Adjudicating Authority’ / ‘Tribunal’. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
