Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Stay of demand - recovery proceedings - scope and ambit of enabling provision namely Section 220(6) - petitioner apart from other reliefs also prayed for not insisting to take 20% of the demand and grant complete stay without any deposit - ITO / AO has not assigned any 'reason' as to why stand taken by the petitioner was not treated to be trustworthy - Matter restored back for reconsideration - HC
Stay of demand - recovery proceedings - scope and ambit of enabling provision namely Section 220(6) - petitioner apart from other reliefs also prayed for not insisting to take 20% of the demand and grant complete stay without any deposit - ITO / AO has not assigned any 'reason' as to why stand taken by the petitioner was not treated to be trustworthy - Matter restored back for reconsideration - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.