Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Liability of directors u/s 179 - Recovery of dues of company - Onus to prove the gross neglect or misfeasance or breach of duty on his part - No material is highlighted by the ITO contrary to material placed on record by Petitioner, based on which he can be held to be guilty of gross neglect or misfeasance or breach of duty in the context of nonrecovery of tax dues. - He is having lack of decision making power and having very limited role in the assessee company even as director - The order against the Director quashed - HC
Liability of directors u/s 179 - Recovery of dues of company - Onus to prove the gross neglect or misfeasance or breach of duty on his part - No material is highlighted by the ITO contrary to material placed on record by Petitioner, based on which he can be held to be guilty of gross neglect or misfeasance or breach of duty in the context of nonrecovery of tax dues. - He is having lack of decision making power and having very limited role in the assessee company even as director - The order against the Director quashed - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.