Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Transfer Pricing Adjustments - benchmarking the purchase of SIM cards by the assessee from its AEs - selection of MAM - CUP v/s RPM - CIT(A) has incorrectly applied the CUP method based on incomplete data, ignoring geographical differences and contrary to the Assessee’s own TP Analysis and contrary to TP Auditor’s Report. CIT(A) has also erroneously aggregated the transactions despite judicial pronouncements on the issue. - AT
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
