Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Principles of unjust enrichment - Refund - leading cogent evidence including the evidence produced earlier - for the period prior to the introduction of Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and Section 27(1A) of the Customs Act, 1962 - Apex Court dismissed the appeal of the STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. - The assessee has to prove that benefit of duty incidence has not been passed on to the buyer of the goods - SC
Principles of unjust enrichment - Refund - leading cogent evidence including the evidence produced earlier - for the period prior to the introduction of Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and Section 27(1A) of the Customs Act, 1962 - Apex Court dismissed the appeal of the STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. - The assessee has to prove that benefit of duty incidence has not been passed on to the buyer of the goods - SC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
