Capital Asset Conversion Requires Proven Business Stock Treatment; Paper Consideration in Spousal Flat Transfers Does Not Create Taxable Business Inco...
Human-probability test defeats political donation deduction where banking records mask accommodation-entry fund layering and evidence shows non-genuin...
Commercial property status protects capital-gains exemption when residential-house ownership limits are tested, while agricultural-land character gove...
Investigation deposits refunded after failed customs demands fall outside the statutory appellate pre-deposit interest regime and may attract compensa...
Resolution plan finality extinguishes unquantified operational-creditor claims and pending proceedings unless the approved plan expressly preserves th...
Page of 4897
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
661 to 680 of 97923 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Addition u/s 68, u/s 69A and section 69 - In the explanatory memorandum to Notification No. 103/2019, it is certified that no person is being adversely affected by giving retrospective effect to this notification. - In the present case, assessee has duly discharged its tax liability under the IDS, 2016 which is prior to the extended due date as well as before the notification itself and, therefore, there is no occasion to put him in an adverse situation. - AT
Addition u/s 68, u/s 69A and section 69 - In the explanatory memorandum to Notification No. 103/2019, it is certified that no person is being adversely affected by giving retrospective effect to this notification. - In the present case, assessee has duly discharged its tax liability under the IDS, 2016 which is prior to the extended due date as well as before the notification itself and, therefore, there is no occasion to put him in an adverse situation. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4897 
