Blocked input tax credit for resort construction remains unavailable; interest follows actual utilisation, while delayed payment attracts statutory pe...
Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
Addition u/s 68, u/s 69A and section 69 - In the explanatory memorandum to Notification No. 103/2019, it is certified that no person is being adversely affected by giving retrospective effect to this notification. - In the present case, assessee has duly discharged its tax liability under the IDS, 2016 which is prior to the extended due date as well as before the notification itself and, therefore, there is no occasion to put him in an adverse situation. - AT
Addition u/s 68, u/s 69A and section 69 - In the explanatory memorandum to Notification No. 103/2019, it is certified that no person is being adversely affected by giving retrospective effect to this notification. - In the present case, assessee has duly discharged its tax liability under the IDS, 2016 which is prior to the extended due date as well as before the notification itself and, therefore, there is no occasion to put him in an adverse situation. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
