Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Addition u/s 68, u/s 69A and section 69 - In the explanatory memorandum to Notification No. 103/2019, it is certified that no person is being adversely affected by giving retrospective effect to this notification. - In the present case, assessee has duly discharged its tax liability under the IDS, 2016 which is prior to the extended due date as well as before the notification itself and, therefore, there is no occasion to put him in an adverse situation. - AT
Addition u/s 68, u/s 69A and section 69 - In the explanatory memorandum to Notification No. 103/2019, it is certified that no person is being adversely affected by giving retrospective effect to this notification. - In the present case, assessee has duly discharged its tax liability under the IDS, 2016 which is prior to the extended due date as well as before the notification itself and, therefore, there is no occasion to put him in an adverse situation. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
