Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The circular issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs on January 1, 2013, instructs department officers to initiate recovery proceedings on confirmed demands unless a stay order is in place. The article outlines the appeal process and time limits under the Central Excise Act, 1944, and the Finance Act, 1994, for both central excise and service tax. It emphasizes the importance of filing appeals and stay petitions promptly to prevent recovery actions. The article also highlights legal recourse, such as filing writ petitions in High Courts, to seek interim relief against coercive recovery measures by the department.
The circular issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs on January 1, 2013, instructs department officers to initiate recovery proceedings on confirmed demands unless a stay order is in place. The article outlines the appeal process and time limits under the Central Excise Act, 1944, and the Finance Act, 1994, for both central excise and service tax. It emphasizes the importance of filing appeals and stay petitions promptly to prevent recovery actions. The article also highlights legal recourse, such as filing writ petitions in High Courts, to seek interim relief against coercive recovery measures by the department.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
