Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Revision u/s 263 - exemption u/s 54F - the exercise aimed at ascertaining the correct income of the assessee has been fulfilled by the Ld. A.O. by exercising his quasi-judicial functions, hence order passed by the assessing officer is neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interest of revenue, therefore, we quash the order under section 263 passed by ld PCIT. - AT
Revision u/s 263 - exemption u/s 54F - the exercise aimed at ascertaining the correct income of the assessee has been fulfilled by the Ld. A.O. by exercising his quasi-judicial functions, hence order passed by the assessing officer is neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interest of revenue, therefore, we quash the order under section 263 passed by ld PCIT. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
