Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Revision u/s 263 - Exemption u/s 11 - Mere statement in the appeal filed by the Revenue before this Court that “no documentary evidence is submitted by the assessee in support of its claim” cannot be countenanced in view of categorical finding of fact by the AO as also the learned ITAT that the assessee-respondent did furnish statements, documents and details as sought for in compliance of notice issued for assessment u/s 143 of the IT Act before the Assessing Officer. - Revision not valid - HC
Revision u/s 263 - Exemption u/s 11 - Mere statement in the appeal filed by the Revenue before this Court that “no documentary evidence is submitted by the assessee in support of its claim” cannot be countenanced in view of categorical finding of fact by the AO as also the learned ITAT that the assessee-respondent did furnish statements, documents and details as sought for in compliance of notice issued for assessment u/s 143 of the IT Act before the Assessing Officer. - Revision not valid - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
