Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Penalty imposed on the Respondents under Section 112(a) and (b) of the Customs Act, 1962, dropped - Respondents had admitted to have been involved in several smuggling activities - it is found that except the statements recorded by the DRI dated 10.06.2019 and 11.06.2019 which were retracted by the Respondents on the first opportunity available on 12.06.2019 before the Ld.CMM, Kolkata, no other corroborative evidence has been brought on record. In that circumstances penalty on the Respondents are not imposable. - AT
Penalty imposed on the Respondents under Section 112(a) and (b) of the Customs Act, 1962, dropped - Respondents had admitted to have been involved in several smuggling activities - it is found that except the statements recorded by the DRI dated 10.06.2019 and 11.06.2019 which were retracted by the Respondents on the first opportunity available on 12.06.2019 before the Ld.CMM, Kolkata, no other corroborative evidence has been brought on record. In that circumstances penalty on the Respondents are not imposable. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
