Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Penalty imposed on the Respondents under Section 112(a) and (b) of the Customs Act, 1962, dropped - Respondents had admitted to have been involved in several smuggling activities - it is found that except the statements recorded by the DRI dated 10.06.2019 and 11.06.2019 which were retracted by the Respondents on the first opportunity available on 12.06.2019 before the Ld.CMM, Kolkata, no other corroborative evidence has been brought on record. In that circumstances penalty on the Respondents are not imposable. - AT
Penalty imposed on the Respondents under Section 112(a) and (b) of the Customs Act, 1962, dropped - Respondents had admitted to have been involved in several smuggling activities - it is found that except the statements recorded by the DRI dated 10.06.2019 and 11.06.2019 which were retracted by the Respondents on the first opportunity available on 12.06.2019 before the Ld.CMM, Kolkata, no other corroborative evidence has been brought on record. In that circumstances penalty on the Respondents are not imposable. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
