Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Dishonor of Cheque - Directors of the company have been made parties in the said case - Merely because the petitioner No.1 is the signatory of the cheque in question, is not at all sufficient to arraign him as an accused. Moreover, the respondent has never made any averment in the complaint against the petitioner No.2 as to how he is responsible for the conduct of the business of the company, though he appears to be the director of the company. - HC
Dishonor of Cheque - Directors of the company have been made parties in the said case - Merely because the petitioner No.1 is the signatory of the cheque in question, is not at all sufficient to arraign him as an accused. Moreover, the respondent has never made any averment in the complaint against the petitioner No.2 as to how he is responsible for the conduct of the business of the company, though he appears to be the director of the company. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
