Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Insolvency and BankruptcyDecember 5, 2022Case LawsHC
Constitutional validity - Regulation 36A of IBC - splitting of the CIRP into inviting expression of interest and then seeking resolution plans - Since Regulation 36A has been amended and passed in accordance with law by the IBBI, the NCLT did not have the power to declare the same as being ultra vires merely on the ground that the two stage process provided in it i.e., of inviting an expression of interest first and then the financial bids, would be contrary to the speedier resolution of the Insolvency Resolution Process - HC
Constitutional validity - Regulation 36A of IBC - splitting of the CIRP into inviting expression of interest and then seeking resolution plans - Since Regulation 36A has been amended and passed in accordance with law by the IBBI, the NCLT did not have the power to declare the same as being ultra vires merely on the ground that the two stage process provided in it i.e., of inviting an expression of interest first and then the financial bids, would be contrary to the speedier resolution of the Insolvency Resolution Process - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
