Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
TDS u/s 195 - DTAA between India and US - disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) - the assessee did not acquire any right from Amazon for which the payments have been made but the payments have been made on the basis of services done by Amazon. Therefore, the payments so made do not fall under the category of Royalty and therefore, the assessee is not liable to deduct any tax from such Royalty. - the provisions of section 195 of the I.T. Act are not applicable - AT
TDS u/s 195 - DTAA between India and US - disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) - the assessee did not acquire any right from Amazon for which the payments have been made but the payments have been made on the basis of services done by Amazon. Therefore, the payments so made do not fall under the category of Royalty and therefore, the assessee is not liable to deduct any tax from such Royalty. - the provisions of section 195 of the I.T. Act are not applicable - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
