Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Addition u/s 68 - We do not understand proposition of the assessee that cash had changed the hands from the company to its promoter–Director without any reason and there is no reason forthcoming as to why the cash was paid in cash by the three parties. There is no document produced before either the AO or before CIT (Appeals) or before us to prove the genuineness of the transaction. - While deleting the addition the CIT (Appeals) has not discussed about the proving of genuineness of the transaction by the assessee. - Matter restored back - AT
Addition u/s 68 - We do not understand proposition of the assessee that cash had changed the hands from the company to its promoter–Director without any reason and there is no reason forthcoming as to why the cash was paid in cash by the three parties. There is no document produced before either the AO or before CIT (Appeals) or before us to prove the genuineness of the transaction. - While deleting the addition the CIT (Appeals) has not discussed about the proving of genuineness of the transaction by the assessee. - Matter restored back - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
