Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Oppression and mismanagement - Transfer of shares - Once it is accepted that the Appellant can also challenge the transfer of shareholding as being oppressive and as being intended only to defeat the right of the Appellant to maintain his petition under Section 397/398 of the Act, an opportunity should have been granted to the Appellant to peruse the register of members and, if so advised, challenge the same in accordance with law. The Company Petition, on the averments made in the Petition itself, could not have been thrown out at the threshold without granting such opportunity to the Appellant. - HC
Oppression and mismanagement - Transfer of shares - Once it is accepted that the Appellant can also challenge the transfer of shareholding as being oppressive and as being intended only to defeat the right of the Appellant to maintain his petition under Section 397/398 of the Act, an opportunity should have been granted to the Appellant to peruse the register of members and, if so advised, challenge the same in accordance with law. The Company Petition, on the averments made in the Petition itself, could not have been thrown out at the threshold without granting such opportunity to the Appellant. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
