Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Dishonor of Cheque - vicarious liability - rebuttal of presumption - non-Executive Independent Directors - What the High Court overlooked was, the contention of these Appellants that they were non-Executive Independent Directors of the Accused Company, based on unimpeachable materials on record. - there could be no justification for not dispensing with the personal appearance of the Appellants, when the Company had entered appearance through an authorized officer. - SC
Dishonor of Cheque - vicarious liability - rebuttal of presumption - non-Executive Independent Directors - What the High Court overlooked was, the contention of these Appellants that they were non-Executive Independent Directors of the Accused Company, based on unimpeachable materials on record. - there could be no justification for not dispensing with the personal appearance of the Appellants, when the Company had entered appearance through an authorized officer. - SC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.