Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Levy of penalty u/s 271D V/S 271E - alleged violation of section 269SS having received Rs.15.50 lacs, in cash from wife - allegation of default specified u/s. 269-T - wrong mention of a section (provision of law) - the penalty u/s. 271D, though not time barred, is not maintainable in the absence of the necessary jurisdiction - the penalty levied is for the default specified u/s. 269-T, and though merited on the whole sum and, in any case, part thereof, is not sustainable in the absence of any penalty having been initiated or levied u/s. 271-E - AT
Levy of penalty u/s 271D V/S 271E - alleged violation of section 269SS having received Rs.15.50 lacs, in cash from wife - allegation of default specified u/s. 269-T - wrong mention of a section (provision of law) - the penalty u/s. 271D, though not time barred, is not maintainable in the absence of the necessary jurisdiction - the penalty levied is for the default specified u/s. 269-T, and though merited on the whole sum and, in any case, part thereof, is not sustainable in the absence of any penalty having been initiated or levied u/s. 271-E - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
