Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Bogus LTCG - Addition u/s 68 - bogus penny stock transaction - suspicion v/s facts - disallowing the exemption u/s 10(38) - The assessee has demonstrated with substantial evidences before the AO that the actual purchase and sale of the shares took place, such shares had distinctive numbers, the transactions were routed through the normal banking channels and the shares had been allotted to the assessee subsequently under an order of amalgamation/merger by the judgment of Hon’ble High Court of Kolkata and, therefore, mere reliance on the report of Investigation Wing and statement of a Person which do not even mention the name of the assessee, in our considered opinion cannot be upheld. - AT
Bogus LTCG - Addition u/s 68 - bogus penny stock transaction - suspicion v/s facts - disallowing the exemption u/s 10(38) - The assessee has demonstrated with substantial evidences before the AO that the actual purchase and sale of the shares took place, such shares had distinctive numbers, the transactions were routed through the normal banking channels and the shares had been allotted to the assessee subsequently under an order of amalgamation/merger by the judgment of Hon’ble High Court of Kolkata and, therefore, mere reliance on the report of Investigation Wing and statement of a Person which do not even mention the name of the assessee, in our considered opinion cannot be upheld. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
