Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Profiteering - Construction Service supplied by the Respondent - Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) to him by way of commensurate reduction in the price - Authority finds no reason to differ from the detailed computation of profiteering in the DGAP’s Report or the methodology adopted. The Authority finds that the Respondent has profiteered by an amount of Rs. 20,57,207/- during the period of investigation - NAPA
Profiteering - Construction Service supplied by the Respondent - Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) to him by way of commensurate reduction in the price - Authority finds no reason to differ from the detailed computation of profiteering in the DGAP’s Report or the methodology adopted. The Authority finds that the Respondent has profiteered by an amount of Rs. 20,57,207/- during the period of investigation - NAPA
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
