Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Profiteering - Construction Service supplied by the Respondent - Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) to him by way of commensurate reduction in the price - Authority finds no reason to differ from the detailed computation of profiteering in the DGAP’s Report or the methodology adopted. The Authority finds that the Respondent has profiteered by an amount of Rs. 20,57,207/- during the period of investigation - NAPA
Profiteering - Construction Service supplied by the Respondent - Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) to him by way of commensurate reduction in the price - Authority finds no reason to differ from the detailed computation of profiteering in the DGAP’s Report or the methodology adopted. The Authority finds that the Respondent has profiteered by an amount of Rs. 20,57,207/- during the period of investigation - NAPA
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.