Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Dishonor of Cheque - role of the accused/petitioners - erstwhile directors - The certified copy of Form-32 is of sterling quality and can be considered by this Court at this stage. It is clear that once the petitioners had resigned way back in 2009 and 2010 respectively, they could not have been responsible either for the issuance of the cheque dated 25th April, 2016 nor for its dishonor in April and May, 2016. They could not have been impleaded as accused in the complaint. - HC
Dishonor of Cheque - role of the accused/petitioners - erstwhile directors - The certified copy of Form-32 is of sterling quality and can be considered by this Court at this stage. It is clear that once the petitioners had resigned way back in 2009 and 2010 respectively, they could not have been responsible either for the issuance of the cheque dated 25th April, 2016 nor for its dishonor in April and May, 2016. They could not have been impleaded as accused in the complaint. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
