Opportunity to furnish unsecured-loan confirmations is required before reassessment initiation; proceedings require fresh consideration after taxpayer...
Under-reporting on a first reassessment return attracts penalty, while enhanced misreporting penalty requires proof of a statutory misreporting catego...
TDS u/s 192 or 194J - payment in respect of doctors engaged as retainers and consultants - distinction between a "contract for service" and a "Contract of service" - the provisions of section 194J of the Act are applicable to the assessee and not those of section 192 of the Income tax Act 1961 therefore, the appellant cannot be treated as an "assessee in default" in so far as the question of deducting tax at source in respect of doctors engaged as retainers and consultants was concerned - AT
TDS u/s 192 or 194J - payment in respect of doctors engaged as retainers and consultants - distinction between a "contract for service" and a "Contract of service" - the provisions of section 194J of the Act are applicable to the assessee and not those of section 192 of the Income tax Act 1961 therefore, the appellant cannot be treated as an "assessee in default" in so far as the question of deducting tax at source in respect of doctors engaged as retainers and consultants was concerned - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.