Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
TDS u/s 192 or 194J - payment in respect of doctors engaged as retainers and consultants - distinction between a "contract for service" and a "Contract of service" - the provisions of section 194J of the Act are applicable to the assessee and not those of section 192 of the Income tax Act 1961 therefore, the appellant cannot be treated as an "assessee in default" in so far as the question of deducting tax at source in respect of doctors engaged as retainers and consultants was concerned - AT
TDS u/s 192 or 194J - payment in respect of doctors engaged as retainers and consultants - distinction between a "contract for service" and a "Contract of service" - the provisions of section 194J of the Act are applicable to the assessee and not those of section 192 of the Income tax Act 1961 therefore, the appellant cannot be treated as an "assessee in default" in so far as the question of deducting tax at source in respect of doctors engaged as retainers and consultants was concerned - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
