Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Dishonor of Cheque - acquittal of accused - prepoderance of probablities - cheque in question is dated 20.04.1999, whereas, the letter asking to repay the amount is of 14.04.1999 i.e. prior to issuance of cheque - In the instant case, considering the evidence on record, it is observed by the learned trial Judge that the cheque in question appears to have been with the complainant prior to 14.04.1999 i.e. the date of post-card/letter written by the complainant to the respondent-accused - when the respondent-accused has succeeded in rebutting the presumption, the learned trial Judge has rightly come to the conclusion that the said provision would be of no help to the complainant. - HC
Dishonor of Cheque - acquittal of accused - prepoderance of probablities - cheque in question is dated 20.04.1999, whereas, the letter asking to repay the amount is of 14.04.1999 i.e. prior to issuance of cheque - In the instant case, considering the evidence on record, it is observed by the learned trial Judge that the cheque in question appears to have been with the complainant prior to 14.04.1999 i.e. the date of post-card/letter written by the complainant to the respondent-accused - when the respondent-accused has succeeded in rebutting the presumption, the learned trial Judge has rightly come to the conclusion that the said provision would be of no help to the complainant. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
