Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Refund of GST - services rendered abroad (export of services) - unjust enrichment - incidence of tax passed to the recipient company or not - burden to prove - GST does not apply to the services rendered abroad as they amount to the export of services. In addition to that the respondent could not establish that the incident of tax has been passed on to the recipient ASCL located in London. Thus, both, the Adjudicating Authority and the Appellate Authority committed error in rejecting the refund of GST of the petitioner. - HC
Refund of GST - services rendered abroad (export of services) - unjust enrichment - incidence of tax passed to the recipient company or not - burden to prove - GST does not apply to the services rendered abroad as they amount to the export of services. In addition to that the respondent could not establish that the incident of tax has been passed on to the recipient ASCL located in London. Thus, both, the Adjudicating Authority and the Appellate Authority committed error in rejecting the refund of GST of the petitioner. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
