Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Claim of Expenditure on hawala business - Assessee also did not submit any proof of incurring any expenditure. Income was also not assessed on net basis @ 0.30 %. No proof of incurring any expenditure is available on record. Therefore, naturally no expenditure is incurred by assessee. Therefore, the action of the learned CIT – A in granting deduction of 10% of the gross income earned by the assessee is not in conformity with the provisions of Section 37 (1) of the act. - AT
Claim of Expenditure on hawala business - Assessee also did not submit any proof of incurring any expenditure. Income was also not assessed on net basis @ 0.30 %. No proof of incurring any expenditure is available on record. Therefore, naturally no expenditure is incurred by assessee. Therefore, the action of the learned CIT – A in granting deduction of 10% of the gross income earned by the assessee is not in conformity with the provisions of Section 37 (1) of the act. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
