Appellate jurisdiction over baggage imports is excluded, requiring confiscation challenges involving passenger-carried gold to proceed by statutory re...
Article 227 review permits intervention in arbitration only for manifest, patent inherent jurisdictional defects, not representational authority dispu...
Addition u/s 14A r.w.r. 8D - There is no such provision in the statute that no disallowance of expenditure could be made on investments made in the earlier years. Admittedly, the exempt income was earned on the investments made in the earlier years and the exempt income was earned in the year under consideration. Therefore, the disallowance made by the AO which was confirmed by the CIT(A) under Rule 8D(2)(iii) is justified. - AT
Addition u/s 14A r.w.r. 8D - There is no such provision in the statute that no disallowance of expenditure could be made on investments made in the earlier years. Admittedly, the exempt income was earned on the investments made in the earlier years and the exempt income was earned in the year under consideration. Therefore, the disallowance made by the AO which was confirmed by the CIT(A) under Rule 8D(2)(iii) is justified. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
