Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Unexplained cash deposits - we are unable to accept the submission made on behalf of the petitioner that presumptive income is purely a question of law and has to be decided as per provisions contained in Section 44 AD and 44 BBB. As we have already held that the petitioner had failed to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for the assessment, the bar of four years would not apply. - HC
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Unexplained cash deposits - we are unable to accept the submission made on behalf of the petitioner that presumptive income is purely a question of law and has to be decided as per provisions contained in Section 44 AD and 44 BBB. As we have already held that the petitioner had failed to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for the assessment, the bar of four years would not apply. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.