Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Condonation of delay of 595 days in filing the appeal - sufficient cause for delay existing or not - declaration under “Arrears category” of the Sabka Vishwas Legacy Dispute Resolution Scheme, 2019 (SVLDRS) - Section 5 of Limitation Act - Doctrine of Equality - None of the said two grounds explains the delay that occurred between 11.12.2018 and 11.03.2019. The non-filing of appeal by the consultant also is not the ‘sufficient cause’ because appellant was required to pursue his consultant and to ensure that his appeal gets filed before 11.03.2018 but appellant failed - the same is definite inaction on part of appellant resulting out of his negligence. - AT
Condonation of delay of 595 days in filing the appeal - sufficient cause for delay existing or not - declaration under “Arrears category” of the Sabka Vishwas Legacy Dispute Resolution Scheme, 2019 (SVLDRS) - Section 5 of Limitation Act - Doctrine of Equality - None of the said two grounds explains the delay that occurred between 11.12.2018 and 11.03.2019. The non-filing of appeal by the consultant also is not the ‘sufficient cause’ because appellant was required to pursue his consultant and to ensure that his appeal gets filed before 11.03.2018 but appellant failed - the same is definite inaction on part of appellant resulting out of his negligence. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
