Loading...

⚠ ✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice — FREE 🎉 ✕

150 credits · 30 days

• Basic Search → 1 Credit
• Advanced Search → 3 Credits
• Drafter → 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(≈ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo →
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

Court Denies Appeal Due to 595-Day Delay; Appellant's Negligence and Inaction Cited as Insufficient Justification.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Condonation of delay of 595 days in filing the appeal - sufficient cause for delay existing or not - declaration under “Arrears category” of the Sabka Vishwas Legacy Dispute Resolution Scheme, 2019 (SVLDRS) - Section 5 of Limitation Act - Doctrine of Equality - None of the said two grounds explains the delay that occurred between 11.12.2018 and 11.03.2019. The non-filing of appeal by the consultant also is not the ‘sufficient cause’ because appellant was required to pursue his consultant and to ensure that his appeal gets filed before 11.03.2018 but appellant failed - the same is definite inaction on part of appellant resulting out of his negligence. - AT....