Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Amnesty Scheme - Composite order of penalty u/s 67 and section 44(10) of the Kerala VAT Act, 2003 - screenshot of the web portal evidencing the rejection of petitioner's application, alleging expiry of time - Petitioner cannot be faulted for the denial of access. The system declined access to the petitioner, contrary to the terms of the scheme. If the error in the system was averted, petitioner would have been eligible to claim the option under the Amnesty Scheme 2020. - HC
Amnesty Scheme - Composite order of penalty u/s 67 and section 44(10) of the Kerala VAT Act, 2003 - screenshot of the web portal evidencing the rejection of petitioner's application, alleging expiry of time - Petitioner cannot be faulted for the denial of access. The system declined access to the petitioner, contrary to the terms of the scheme. If the error in the system was averted, petitioner would have been eligible to claim the option under the Amnesty Scheme 2020. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
