Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Unexplained bank deposits - PCIT, without making further inquiry on his own account, has simply stated in the impugned order that the Assessing officer was required to make more inquiries. PCIT has not pointed out as to what further inquiry was the Assessing officer required to make and as to how without those inquires the order of the Assessing officer was erroneous in so far as prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue. Thus exercise of revisional jurisdiction by the Ld. PCIT is without any justification. - AT
Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Unexplained bank deposits - PCIT, without making further inquiry on his own account, has simply stated in the impugned order that the Assessing officer was required to make more inquiries. PCIT has not pointed out as to what further inquiry was the Assessing officer required to make and as to how without those inquires the order of the Assessing officer was erroneous in so far as prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue. Thus exercise of revisional jurisdiction by the Ld. PCIT is without any justification. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
