Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Insolvency and BankruptcyMarch 15, 2022Case LawsAT
CIRP - Resolution Process - contention of appellant is that prior approval from the lessor has not been taken before sub-leasing portion of the land to the ‘Corporate Debtor’ for development of the Housing Project - It is beyond comprehension as to how the Appellant/NOIDA could have overlooked this factual scenario for 7 long years, having approved the Building Plans, having accepted the premium amounts and the lease rentals and now at this stage of CIRP, stating that they were completely unaware of any such Housing Project coming up, is completely untenable. - AT
CIRP - Resolution Process - contention of appellant is that prior approval from the lessor has not been taken before sub-leasing portion of the land to the ‘Corporate Debtor’ for development of the Housing Project - It is beyond comprehension as to how the Appellant/NOIDA could have overlooked this factual scenario for 7 long years, having approved the Building Plans, having accepted the premium amounts and the lease rentals and now at this stage of CIRP, stating that they were completely unaware of any such Housing Project coming up, is completely untenable. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
