Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Bribery - demand of illegal gratification - demand of ₹ 3,000/- by way of illegal gratification was made by the appellant for passing the assessment order - this is a case where the demand of illegal gratification by the appellant was not proved by the prosecution. Thus, the demand which is sine quo non for establishing the offence under Section 7 was not established. - SC
Bribery - demand of illegal gratification - demand of ₹ 3,000/- by way of illegal gratification was made by the appellant for passing the assessment order - this is a case where the demand of illegal gratification by the appellant was not proved by the prosecution. Thus, the demand which is sine quo non for establishing the offence under Section 7 was not established. - SC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
