Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Disallowance of rent - allowable revenue expenditure u/s 37 or not? - In this case the appellant has not filed any documents to establish that the expenditure was incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business of the expenditure. The burden of proof is on appellant. Appellant failed to discharge the same. - AT
Disallowance of rent - allowable revenue expenditure u/s 37 or not? - In this case the appellant has not filed any documents to establish that the expenditure was incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business of the expenditure. The burden of proof is on appellant. Appellant failed to discharge the same. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
