<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellant&#039;s Rent Claim Denied as Revenue Expenditure u/s 37 Due to Insufficient Business Purpose Documentation.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=61951</link>
    <description>Disallowance of rent - allowable revenue expenditure u/s 37 or not? - In this case the appellant has not filed any documents to establish that the expenditure was incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business of the expenditure. The burden of proof is on appellant. Appellant failed to discharge the same. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2022 17:37:44 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2022 17:37:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=670265" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellant&#039;s Rent Claim Denied as Revenue Expenditure u/s 37 Due to Insufficient Business Purpose Documentation.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=61951</link>
      <description>Disallowance of rent - allowable revenue expenditure u/s 37 or not? - In this case the appellant has not filed any documents to establish that the expenditure was incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business of the expenditure. The burden of proof is on appellant. Appellant failed to discharge the same. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2022 17:37:44 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=61951</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>