Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Insolvency and BankruptcyFebruary 5, 2022Case LawsTri
Initiation of CIRP - Whether the WhatsApp conversation between the Parties can be admitted as evidence? - The proof of service through electronic mode would not form part of a record as an evidence whereas the WhatsApp messages are filed to be admitted as evidence. Hence it cannot be said that Section 20 of the Companies Act permits a party to produce electronic evidence without it being accompanied by the section 65B certificate. Hence, on the 2nd ground also the petition fails. - this Petition is liable to be dismissed - Tri
Initiation of CIRP - Whether the WhatsApp conversation between the Parties can be admitted as evidence? - The proof of service through electronic mode would not form part of a record as an evidence whereas the WhatsApp messages are filed to be admitted as evidence. Hence it cannot be said that Section 20 of the Companies Act permits a party to produce electronic evidence without it being accompanied by the section 65B certificate. Hence, on the 2nd ground also the petition fails. - this Petition is liable to be dismissed - Tri
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.