Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Banking and other financial services - RCM - So far the SWIFT charges are concerned, the privity of contract is between the Indian Bank and the SWIFT society. Thus, the receiver of the services is the Indian Bank, and not the appellant/assessee. - The appellant/assessee only have reimbursed such SWIFT charges to the Indian bank. Accordingly, the appellant is not the receiver of SWIFT services, hence not liable to pay service tax on the same - AT
Banking and other financial services - RCM - So far the SWIFT charges are concerned, the privity of contract is between the Indian Bank and the SWIFT society. Thus, the receiver of the services is the Indian Bank, and not the appellant/assessee. - The appellant/assessee only have reimbursed such SWIFT charges to the Indian bank. Accordingly, the appellant is not the receiver of SWIFT services, hence not liable to pay service tax on the same - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
