Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Insolvency and BankruptcyJanuary 8, 2022Case LawsSC
Determination of insolvency resolution costs - payments of costs and expenses incurred by the Resolution Professional (RP) - Neither the basis of the claim nor its reasonableness has been considered by the adjudicating authority. The appellate authority has merely proceeded in an ad hoc manner on the ground that the amount of ₹ 5,00,000 as fee, in addition to the expenses, appears to be reasonable. - In the absence of any reasons either in the order of the NCLT or the appellate authority, it is impossible for the Court to deduce the basis on which the payment of an amount of ₹ 5,00,000 together with expenses has been found to be reasonable. Consequently, an order of remand becomes necessary. - SC
Determination of insolvency resolution costs - payments of costs and expenses incurred by the Resolution Professional (RP) - Neither the basis of the claim nor its reasonableness has been considered by the adjudicating authority. The appellate authority has merely proceeded in an ad hoc manner on the ground that the amount of ₹ 5,00,000 as fee, in addition to the expenses, appears to be reasonable. - In the absence of any reasons either in the order of the NCLT or the appellate authority, it is impossible for the Court to deduce the basis on which the payment of an amount of ₹ 5,00,000 together with expenses has been found to be reasonable. Consequently, an order of remand becomes necessary. - SC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
