Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Reverse charge mechanism - GTA service - appellant were proprietorship concerns - the demand for the period April, 2016 to June, 2017 is also liable to be set aside. Although the appellant has also raised the issue of threshold exemption under notification no.33/2012-ST dated 20.62012 but as it is already held that since those proprietary concerned have been registered as factories, they are liable to pay service tax under reverse charge mechanism, therefore the issue of threshold exemption, is not decided upon. - AT
Reverse charge mechanism - GTA service - appellant were proprietorship concerns - the demand for the period April, 2016 to June, 2017 is also liable to be set aside. Although the appellant has also raised the issue of threshold exemption under notification no.33/2012-ST dated 20.62012 but as it is already held that since those proprietary concerned have been registered as factories, they are liable to pay service tax under reverse charge mechanism, therefore the issue of threshold exemption, is not decided upon. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.